[1]
A Big Mouth is Easier to Trip Over
“I do”. Cue music. Enter happiness.
Escape misery. You are now a beautiful couple, destined for grace, abundance,
and bliss. Right? That depends on who/what you are saying “I do” to. Let me
explain, in the early 1900’s not being married was quite rare, and divorce was
even more seldom. Per the CDC, from 1920-1940, divorces were marginally low. [2] The primary reason was
early Americans’ view of marriage was quite conventional or even “traditional”,
whatever that means. They exalted the institution of marriage as something
sacred and righteous, which it is, and did it mainly because that was the norm.
But the problem was they did not necessarily say “I do” to that person opposite
of them, in front of the “man of the cloth”, but to being married in general. Sure,
they stuck it out in regards to not really getting divorced, but that’s all
they did, they endured. Cue 1945-1967. A general diagram from the CDC shows a
horrible phenomenon.[3]
A tremendous growth in divorces occurred. Now there are many
factors at play, I am sure. But let me propose the core facet: the philosophy
of marriage changed. They went from dehumanizing the composition of marriage to
the other side of the pendulum: over-legalizing it. Or alternatively said, they
went from making it an obligation to a contract. In the 1950’s marriage became nullifiable
just off the basis for being unsatisfied with the other partner. That is to
say, “You are not giving me what I want, so I am leaving”. A contract. But the honest, correct, and Godly view is
relationally focused and in the middle of that pendulum. It’s not an
obligation, it’s not a contract, it’s a commitment.
My wife and
I are babies in the matrimonial world. But we have experienced so much in that
little amount of time. And we have stayed true to each other because of one
simple truth: I said yes to her in all that she is and she said yes to me in all that I am, no more and no less. I did
not say yes to the things she can give me. I did not say yes to the concept of
marriage. I said yes to the loving, honest, feisty, God-honoring, family
oriented, woman she is. I said yes to her failures and short comings too. I don’t
expect her to have it all together, I don’t expect her to respond to every
situation ideally. I don’t expect anything from her. Here is why.
When you
think of the word integrity what do
you think? When I think of that word
I imagine a man in a suit with a noble posture. Integrity, in laymen’s terms,
means to do what you say you’re going to do. Now, if we were to be held exactly
to everything we said- I mean to the letter- we would choose our words very carefully, right? Well, why don’t we? I remember being at the
court house for a family member and listening to the Latin American judge offer
wisdom to a Latin American teen. And after a long diatribe, the judge stopped
talking and said, “real men choose their words carefully, stay away from the
chatterboxes”. I thought about that for a while and did an inventory on myself
and came to the uncomfortable conclusion that I talked too much. I over committed
myself. I didn’t think before I agreed to something. Which in turn may suggested
not only an immaturity but a lack of integrity. So, I worked on that, it has
been an ongoing process. But here is my point, when I said "I do" I effectively
said, “I take you as you are, not as you should be” and to expect anything more
of her lacks integrity. But here is the other part, I made vows….
“The first to speak in court sounds right, until
the cross-examination begins.” Proverb 18:17 NLT
[1] http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2007/startracks/071008/kate_hudson2.jpg
[2] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_21/sr21_024.pdf
[2] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_21/sr21_024.pdf
[3]
Ibid. 8.